This was definitely a challenging essay for me, but after reading through it many times I have finally came to a response. When reading these ideas, I was persuaded by some of these ideas, yet some I believed to be flaws. First of all, one idea that I thought was persuasive was that everyone should have compassion for each other. Also I believed in your ethical beliefs. For example, ripping people off during a crisis is undoubtedly an unmoral act. These were the ideas that persuaded me to agreeing with your premise, yet I feel that are some flaws with your philosophy.

Although I think that people should be treated equally, financial wise, people who work hard should earn more than others who don't work at all. Also, I somewhat disagree with the idea that a relative comparison between different classes of people exaggerate the problem. I don't believe that this is the case. For example, when comparing two people such as a homeless person and Donald Trump, the situation would look severe. In contrast, when comparing someone who works at Walmart and one who works at Safeway, the situation is not as critical. Finally, I feel that when you mention Jesus I do not see a crucial persuasive point.