The autobiographical story of Carlos Bulosan in America is in the Heart is the story of America from a perspective no one cares to acknowledge and appreciate because there is nothing, other than Carlos Bulosan’s book, that deeply reconciles this view of America. I believe that the universal notion that America is a land for the free is not a cliché at all because it is this notion that perpetuates America’s ability to continually burn as a beacon of freedom. In fact, Bulosan came to this conclusion towards the end of his narrative as he saw America’s freedom as a “huge heart unfolding warmly” toward him. Through his turbulent American experience he discovered something in America beyond freedom and how it became diluted through racial inhibitions; Bulosan’s American experience culminated with the discovery of his true self, which ultimately kept his “faith” in America.
Bulosan’s autobiography begins with his impoverished childhood in a rural village in the Philippines. At this time of his life it is just a struggle for survival amongst corruption and a lack of opportunity for his peasant family. During this period of Bulosan’s life he is mesmerized with the wonderful fantasies of what America had to offer through his older brother Macario. Due to the Western influence of Macario’s education Carlos is enthralled with how the idea of America has radically changed his brother. Macario encouraged Carlos to get a Western haircut and showed him, though dimly, the light in knowledge. This first brush with America acted as a catalyst towards Bulosna’s eventual immigration.
Once Bulosan immigrates to west coast America he is catapulted into a nomadic lifestyle interacting with the Filipino-immigrant America not with the America he envisioned. Racism and exploitation sum up all that needs to be said of Bulosan’s early American experience. But from these struggles he met influential people, such as labor union activists wanting to give Filipinos better rights, and contemporary writers of that era who saw Bulosan’s talent in writing, that evoked the true America he yearned.
The section where America is in the Heart reveals its true purpose begins when Bulosan catastrophically contracts tuberculosis. While undergoing treatment he underwent an intellectual enlightenment that culminated all his struggles in America. Eileen Odell who gave him books that sparked his interest and kept his sanity while in a Los Angeles hospital assisted Bulosan into this period of contemplation.
The profound effect Bulosan experienced from reading is best exemplified when he wrote “I trembled with delight when I came upon a brilliant phrase or a novel idea. While the other patients were worrying and complaining, I explored the worlds of great men’s minds.”
Bulosan’s involvement in the diverse books lent to him also helped him find solace in his predicament just as “writers reacted to the social dynamics of their time.” As Bulosan began divulging the priceless knowledge between each page he read he began honing his understanding of himself by connecting his life’s experience to the author. Bulosan found “reading widened my mental horizon, creating a spiritual kinship with other men who had pondered over the miseries of their countries.”
From Bulosan’s self-education through reading he found the reason why he had to write. Bulosan found writing cemented his true self toward the American idea permanently and reading showed him that experience is all he had to write from. This revelation revealed itself when Bulosan’s own influence was reflected by an Arkansas boy named John Custer whom Bulosan formed amity with at the hospital. John Custer wrote:
“I doubt if you remember me. I met you in the Los Angeles County Hospital years ago and you wrote a letter for me. I returned to Arkansas and followed your suggestion. I found a job and educated myself when I was not working. I have studied American history, which was your suggestion. Learning to read and write is knowing America, my country. Knowing America is actually knowing myself. Knowing myself is also knowing how to serve my country. Now I’m serving her…”
I believe that even though Carlos Bulosan never truly became an American citizen or totally benefited from all of America’s ideals he still discovered America at its best. Even though America held several different races and people she still enabled all those ideals to coalesce into one “social force” just as the authors of his books gravitated towards. America is in the Heart contains Bulosan’s faith in America, that it will someday enable all of us to find our true self.
At various stages of his life Carlos Bulosan emphatically and materially lived the ideals that surrounded him while in America. Through the American freedom of allowing and harboring diverse ideals, a myriad of dictums filled into his consciousness. Reading enabled him to vicariously see these ideals, while writing evaluated them. What explains Carlos Bulosan’s American experience is not what hardships he suffered but what he transformed these hardships into, which is the embodiment of America. Bulosan took all the ideals he formulated during his tribulations and made them reality through voicing himself through his poignant writing. America is in the Heart demonstrates America is the revolution and evolution of ideals and hardships clashing from different points of history as they imperfectly conform to the present. That is the life Carlos Bulosan inherited when he came to America and that is the prospect America is in the Heart wishes to tell all of us. America’s magnanimity should be taken beyond the promise of material wealth through hard work. In truth, America offers a dream so benevolent that Filipinos and all other races wish to have and only a few are able to grasp it for its full value; that value is the drive of the human spirit.
Edited at 2007/07/11 18:14:48 PDT
I think the author of the article points out an interesting trend between our pop culture and our moral limits. Unfortunately, I also agree that they go hand in hand. What also is unnerving was how we have such a capacity for violence today that it brings to mind the brutality and romanticized violence ancient Rome accepted during its downfall. There was an article in the newspaper that analyzed how movies rated PG-13 are getting more violent and pushing the envelope in movie ratings so that violence is now widely accepted in even family targeted movies, such as Pirates of the Caribbean. The author stated that there was a contradiction even in our own government, that is now run heavily by theocratic individuals who are supposed hold high moral convictions, that advocate violence to attack a wrong just as movies advocate violence to pretend to attack a wrong when in fact they are just exacerbating the publics overall tolerance for violence. I concur with him to a certain extent that morality should be better addressed in the media, but I find it, in my opinion, necessary to facilitate any means necessary to protect our well being even if it incorporates torture. Revenge is a total contradiction in itself but I find protection paramount in our survival and that is what we must advocate because our "enemy" has committed travesties against us that even our low moral convictions can not tolerate.
On another note, violence in the media must be allowed to a certain degree. I liked how the author interpreted violence as a tool to promote sadism in flicks like Sin City and Kill Bill just for the fun of it not to reflect on an underlying meaning; this also includes horror movies that lack in any substantive plots. But I think violence is necessary to except evil for what it is, cruel and rampant with sadism. Movies like The Passion of the Christ, Band of Brothers Series, The Patriot, Star Wars, etc. need violence to portray the movie's noble purpose, to reflect on the glories of the hero. When the movie uses violence to aggravate our primitive instincts just for the entertainment value in it there is an apparent wrong in that.
Another interesting contradiction on how our culture relates to violence is our attachment to religion and morals simultaneously. For example the "Passion" advocates ultimate sacrifice and still glorifies sadism at the same time just as radical theistic cults today relate violence to achieving the glory of their determined morals. Our problem is not only the media's acceptance for violence and licentious material it is our own gravitation toward those things.
Edited at 2007/07/08 12:05:58 PDT
I wholeheartedly believe in Joseph's thesis that, as humans, we are instinctive in helping our fellow humans even when that instinct has not been nurtured or entirely manifested. I also concur that it is our responsibility to assist humans in need rather than observing as bystanders admiring our own fortunateness. I can support this claim because I do participate in fund-raisers that feed the poor or give gifts to the less fortunate. So the ethical demand that gravitates humanity toward an instinctive sameness resides in my self-consciousness constantly and I am just as guilty as everyone else in my apathy. I also agree with the fact that society does have a decadence to it that is way too shallow in its purpose; as it gorges on a surplus of resources that could provide so much for others on the other side of the Earth. The money invested and wasted from political campaigns, private jets, spoiled brats' sweet sixteen parties, cosmetic surgery, homes that could pass for hotels, political payoffs and ongoing nepotism could all have been used to help a greater good that will constantly be in disequilibrium. I believe if we act with more humility and with more charity it will not only save our own soul's sanity but it could save others this is the major dissension I have with Joseph's view.
As humans it is true we have a self-consciousness to become ethical toward others in a giving way but we also have the instinct to survive through competition, which is what defines the state of nature we still subsist. Joseph's stipulation for a sane world that "each person receives according to their needs and labors according to their abilities" is an ideal filled with only good intentions for humanity but is fatally wrong because it contradicts humanity's inclination for competition and it will provide a hierarchy that Joseph himself calls out to be a human injustice. Charles Darwin once theorized nature evolves to meet the stresses of the environment presented and runs on the basic program of survival of the fittest. Not coincidentally, humanity runs on the same program. I believe humanity will never reach an equality in socio-economic stature because we all have different passions and goals that drives us to our own means of surviving, therefore those of us who wish not to work or become productive members of society will not have equal socio-economic status to someone who works harder to achieve their goal. This example works in nature, if a group of a species is born with a trait suitable for it to survive it will flourish with offspring just as strong; while if another of that same species is born without that vital trait that group will die to allow the strong to continue through evolution. If Joseph's ideal was applied to nature then every group of a species would receive the nourishment to survive but the weak would dilute the gene pool and inhibit evolution and progress. As humans we need to compete to innovate and evolve our own knowledge but if we are provided resources without trying to work beyond our limits we will go backwards in our evolution. Lastly, in order to distribute the needs of humans equally it would need a complex bureaucracy to be successful. Referring back to the history of civilizations who tried to function on a bureaucracy we have clear evidence such a system will not work because of inefficiency in distribution and those in bureaucratic positions will abuse their power. These things will happen because it is inherent human nature, those in power will strive to keep it manifesting even more inequality and injustice. I will stake my belief that people's effort should be rewarded disproportionately based on the energy and passion they exert because that is how nature has operated since life's existence. And as long as those who have made a fortune off hard work act charitably and refrain from decadence they deserve what they have achieved, that is my definition of freedom.
AIRY
An airy breeze blows through the area and disturbs the sand.
warm humid
A warm humid breeze glides through the area disturbing the sand.
Edited at 2007/07/08 15:00:39 PDT
Descriptive Essay on a Smithsonian Photo
A middle-eastern man, dressed in purple garments, treks on his camel leisurely oblivious to the ancient wonders surrounding him. To his side stand derelict columns, which are mostly toppled leaving only half of their original structure protruding into the sky. Of the several columns remaining only one remains erect in its original form waiting to greet travelers of every nation once again as they enter the rock born city. Those days of such prosperity are over and now that remains are the indestructible bones of a once lavish city. An ancient stone road holds firmly onto the earth it was originally laid as the man on the camel continues his lethargic trek. The desert air preserves the stones of Petra and remains a reminder of time's prevalence.
Behind the man on his camel loom the rock-hewn buildings of ancient Petra that were carved directly from a massive stone edifice. The buildings hide so completely within the rust-red rock that they are dissolved by the mountainous landscape. At first glance it could be mistaken as a mirage. These auburn monoliths hold both ancient Greek, Roman and Indian influence which is most pronounced in their arches, ornate pillars and elephant reliefs. Like a layered cake Petra's rock fortress has layers of red, orange, vermillion, culminating with tinges of brown. The hillside surrounding the manmade structures texture is rough dominated with divergent crags with crags and menacing triangular protrusions; while the texture of Petra's palatial stone structures are as smooth as any other megalith erected during ancient times.
Although the city has long been dead and the air is stagnant you can still imagine the pungent smell of foreign spices that filled the air when the bustle of trade was still present within the city walls. Life still does litter of Petra in sparse bursts, evident by the numerous olive shaded shrubs that surround the area. Indigenous people also occupy the city of Petra but have forgotten the city's importance it once played in the world. They live off the land as nomads, a thousand years behind the advancement of their ancient ancestors.
An airy breeze blows through the area and disturbs the sand. The sand is time constantly falling. What also is profuse in Petra is the presence of history that is present in the architecture of Petra and the mystery its structures espouse. Today the enigma of Petra is a fantastic story half comprehended and completely forgotten in time.